Don't trust the negative comments about AI like GPT and Claude too much

You know those common criticisms: "It lies well," "It's inaccurate," or "It's just at the level of a simple chatbot."
"Ultimately, cross-checking is necessary." (I agree with this to some extent.)
But please, filter out all those other comments.
The most core element of using AI is data collection.
Of course, some people use it for creative work, but in reality, most of the work we do isn't particularly creative, except for those who are truly exceptional.
In the end, it's all about collecting data, organizing it, and interpreting it.
What highly competent subordinates would take two or three hours to scrape and present in an easy-to-read format, ChatGPT can interpret vast amounts of data and present it neatly in at most 8 minutes.
It has simply surpassed human capability levels.
Even its creative aspects are becoming increasingly sophisticated.
In a way, isn't this to be expected?
If we compare it to humans, it's like having the greatest geniuses in history as your subordinates.
I am certain that anyone still making negative remarks about AI falls into one of these three categories:
1. People who haven't used AI yet and want others to fall behind.
2. People who haven't used AI proactively yet.
3. People who tried it briefly in the past, thought "Oh, this is mediocre," and stopped using it.
One-line summary: It can handle almost anything you throw at it, to the point of making you wonder, "It can do this too?", and its accuracy has risen to a level where it is difficult to find falsehoods.
If you are suspicious, simply cross-checking is enough.