The KEY to Judicial and Prosecutorial Reform

Prohibiting judges from opening law practices after retirement. A lifelong judge.
Once appointed as a prosecutor, a lifelong prosecutor. Prohibiting opening a law practice.
In exchange, they receive appropriate social respect.
If this happens, the low-class, treasonous, and pro-Japanese forces will surely
throw a tantrum, foaming at the mouth about "liberal democracy,"
calling it "unconstitutional communism that annihilates freedom of occupation."
However, many advanced nations in the US, Europe, and Singapore, etc.,
share a commonality: while the degree varies from total prohibition to near-prohibition,
they prevent the birth of
corrupt legal professionals who exchange power for money.
Then, why on earth did they adopt so-called
"communist-style" (a term used by treasonous pro-Japanese forces) social and legal regulations
that restrict the freedom of choice of occupation?
Ultimately, it is because judges and prosecutors, upon retirement, become lawyers
and contaminate investigations, indictments, and rulings directed at their junior colleagues,
allowing former judges and prosecutors to accumulate
massive and dirty wealth.
They learned this through experience
and established prohibitive protocols.
Once such discussions begin,
concerns about the avoidance of judicial/prosecutorial roles by talented individuals,
the expected decline in judicial quality,
and the agitation by the trashy, reactionary media like Jo-Joong-Dong will arise.
To prevent the stripping of the prosecutor's supplementary investigation powers,
the dirty agitation they have committed,
such as emphasizing police incompetence and corruption
and working to idolize the prosecution,
will run rampant.
For those who think, "I won't be a judge or prosecutor because I can't make money,"
it is an absolute truth that they should not become judges or prosecutors from the very beginning.
Our country has more than enough talent.
It is a country that lacks opportunity.