The assassins' excuses for the director are so lame lol

‌He claims that back when the assassination of First Lady Yuk Young-soo happened,
he was around in 5th grade,
so it was a shock at such a young age,
and since there were many suspicions surrounding the incident, he wanted to explore that aspect.
He says he had absolutely no intention of doing anything else,
but since things escalated more than expected,
maybe he's flustered himself,
because he's rambling incoherently in every interview.
I mean, stop mumbling and just say it—
what is the truth of that day as you see it,
and what is the truth this movie is trying to convey?
Instead of saying that,
he keeps beating around the bush and stuttering.
When a director makes a movie, there must be a creative intention;
are you saying you just made it without any purpose or direction?
Is it your way of using an "open ending"
to just throw out some bait
and let people imagine and tear it apart on their own?
If the public gets hooked like they used to and it hits the jackpot, we become hit directors and hit actors,
and if not, it's just an "open ending" so everyone can just imagine things themselves? lol
He was a director who actually made a mark on the Korean film industry with melodramas in his early career,
but maybe he got impatient because his subsequent films didn't do well.
Why did he have to take such unnecessary risks to make something like this?
Anyway, I don't know why those people love "the truth" so much.
Day in and day out, it's "the truth, the truth, the truth of that day."
If they aren't satisfied with it, then it's just not the truth, I guess. lol