Didn't it end with Yoo Hae-jin's interview?

‌Yoo Hae-jin reportedly cautiously expressed his opinion to the director that he didn't think he could appear based on the first script,
and after several revisions, he eventually ended up starring in it.
I haven't seen the movie myself, of course,
and while the movie doesn't explicitly single out Park Chung-hee,
they say the term 'the powers above the Queen Consort' is used.
The director also mentioned in an interview that it refers to the power struggles above the Queen Consort.
In doing so, he cites the friction between Cha Ji-chul and Kim Jae-gyu as an example.
This is the part that makes no sense:
The day First Lady Yuk Young-soo passed away
was at a point when the October Yushin had not even been in place for two years.
Then, five years later, President Park Chung-hee was also shot by Kim Jae-gyu.
In other words, at that specific time, Park Chung-hee's power was obviously at its peak,
and it was a time when Shin Ji-su, the Director of the KCIA, had been appointed for less than a year.
Of course, even if there were power struggles and friction, the situation then
is clearly different from the situation five years later.
The KCIA, which could make even a bird fall from the sky, was Park Chung-hee's henchman;
to say that associating 'the powers above the KCIA' with Park Chung-hee is a leap in logic
is just a joke to me.
In the past, an actor tried to lecture people, claiming the movie wasn't a hit because the audience couldn't read between the lines,
acting out of a sense of superiority.
It makes me feel like shit wondering if all film industry professionals are actually like this.