Where should we look to find the reasons why "Fox Riding" hates Cho Seong-eun?

On July 17, 2025, the Constitutional Court unanimously dismissed the petition for the impeachment of Prosecutor Son Jun-seong, a key figure in the "instigation of complaints" case, with all seven justices in agreement. The Court ruled that while Prosecutor Son violated the Constitution by failing to maintain political neutrality as a prosecutor, there were no grounds justifying his dismissal. Previously, on April 24 of the same year, Prosecutor Son also received a final acquittal from the Supreme Court in a case where he was indicted for violating the Public Official Election Act. While the first instance court sentenced him to one year in prison, the second instance overturned this and declared him not guilty on all counts. Is the instigation of complaints case finally over?
The core of this case is whether Prosecutor Son Jun-seong, belonging to the Investigation Information Policy Officer's Office of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office—often called the "eyes and ears" of the Prosecutor General—instigated complaints through Kim Woong, a candidate for the United Future Party, requesting punishment for "a series of false planned reports aimed at intervening in the election," specifically regarding MBC's "Channel A media-prosecution collusion suspicion" report and News Tapa's report on Kim Keon-hee's Deutsche Motors stock manipulation suspicions. At the time, the Prosecutor General was Yoon Suk-yeol, and the complaint contained arguments from the sides of Kim Keon-hee and Han Dong-hoon.
Among the 13 respondents mentioned in the complaint at the time, there were figures from the ruling camp such as writer Rhyu Si-min, but 8 of them were News Tapa reporters and MBC reporters/PDs who wrote critical articles regarding Yoon Suk-yeol, Han Dong-hoon, and Kim Keon-hee. This unprecedented incident, where journalists were targeted for investigation and their voices silenced simply because they criticized the spouse and close associates of the sitting Prosecutor General in an attempt to protect the Prosecutor General, must be viewed as an act of subverting the state, where the prosecution intervened in the election and attempted to intimidate the freedom of the press.
In a prosecution organization that moves as one body through strict top-down command, no one believes that Prosecutor Son Jun-seong planned the instigation of complaints alone as a personal deviation. The appellate court recognized that Prosecutor Son was involved in drafting the complaint, stating, "It is difficult to exclude the possibility that a superior, such as the Prosecutor General, planned the complaint, selected Kim Woong as the person to deliver the complaint, and maintained close contact with Kim Woong," judging that there was a possibility that Prosecutor Son reported the drafting of the complaint to Prosecutor General Yoon Suk-yeol.
In this case, the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) failed to even summon the higher-ups suspected of involvement in the instigation of complaints and cleared Yoon Suk-yeol and Han Dong-hoon of charges. Regarding Prosecutor Son Jun-seong, the court did not recognize the admissibility of key evidence due to failure to meet procedural requirements during the search and seizure process. Ultimately, while Prosecutor Son was not punished, the facts were revealed that he transmitted data to someone, which was then delivered through Kim Woong of the United Future Party to the informant of this case, Ms. Cho Seong-eun (former Vice Chair of the United Future Party's election committee), without a significant time gap.
Above all, it was clearly recognized that the prosecutor violated political neutrality. The instigation of complaints case, which can be seen as political maneuvering by the political prosecution during the general election, must not end without anyone taking responsibility. Last March, the CIO announced that the case in which Ms. Cho Seong-eun filed complaints against Yoon Suk-yeol, Kim Keon-hee, and Han Dong-hoon for charges including abuse of power, perjury, and destruction of evidence was assigned to Investigation Division 3, but there has been no progress for over a year. For the prosecutorial reform of the Lee Jae-myung administration to succeed, it is crucial to uncover the truth of this case.
Input 2026.04.03 10:08
Modified 2026.04.03 22:51
Source: Media Today (https://www.mediatoday.co.kr)
https://www.mediatoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=333518
ㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡ
Why does the "New Jae-myung Fox Riding" hate Cho Seong-eun, who reported the corruption involving the political prosecution and the "Insurrection Party" Yoon Suk-yeol and Han Dong-hoon?
Is it perhaps because she reported a case that became one of the pretexts for the prosecutorial reform that Lee Jae-myung dislikes, and because she is criticizing Lee Jae-myung for not implementing prosecutorial reform?
Transparent sexiness ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ