Automated LC review — now right here in the GuildUpload documents → AI discrepancy analysis → correction guide.
NEW Start LC Review →
← Lounge

The reason I wrote that someone had died only after completing all fact-checking procedures

Machine translated


To be honest, I am writing this only after going through all the fact-checking procedures regarding your deaths. Actually, I used indirect language because I was worried about being charged with defamation of the deceased, but even though I know I can write it directly, I am choosing not to.
He came to Busan (at that time) a week ago, and knowing that he was brought here artificially, he remembered that woman. And because that woman is unique, he remembers her.
Then, less than a month later, when the death appeared in the media, that is when the evidence was being collected.
Then, the police officers were going to keep framing him and ruin his life before he went in, but in the end, that police station was exposed, wasn't it? You are causing serious family discord in your household.
If a police officer does something like that, they can no longer work within the police force. Because they are exposing the police, right?
I heard you were planning to go in after doing that?
I collected evidence based on what that woman disclosed like that.
Since I was speaking indirectly, do you think I'm writing fiction?
To the investigative officer among the Busan police: You were caught trying to frame him by exploiting information asymmetry.
Why? It seems like after doing that, you said, "Do whatever you want."?
This is what happens when you try to frame someone as having schizophrenia.
Your Senior Superintendent's family has been completely destroyed like this.

Comments 0

No comments yet
0