Automated LC review — now right here in the GuildUpload documents → AI discrepancy analysis → correction guide.
NEW Start LC Review →
← Lounge

Someone said Lee Jae-myung's problem is blaming others

Machine translated

It is truly amazing how someone who posts dozens of comments a day on Bobae while saying such things could have endured Yoon Suk-yeol.
In the early days of his administration, whenever he failed at something, articles blaming the previous government would appear several times a week.
He kept doing that even until the martial law nonsense.
I asked Gemini about the frequency of blaming the previous administration between the two governments.
It said that during Yoon's term, the frequency of blaming the previous administration was 15,000 times.
He doesn't do the work he's supposed to do and just blames others for everything he messes up... what a piece of trash.
When comparing the frequency of the two governments blaming their predecessors quantitatively, the frequency of the Yoon Suk-yeol government targeting the Moon Jae-in government with 'blame for the previous administration' is overwhelmingly higher.
The reason for this difference is that the terms of office, political backgrounds, and the processes of the end of the previous administrations were completely different. Comparing the patterns and intensity of both sides, the distinct differences are as follows:

1. Yoon Suk-yeol Government's 'Blame on Moon Jae-in Government': Long-term and systemic offensive
From the beginning to the middle of his term, the Yoon Suk-yeol government cited the failures of the Moon Jae-in government in almost every area of state affairs. According to media research such as the media analysis platform (Big Kinds), the frequency was so high that more than 15,000 articles were reported regarding 'blame on the Moon Jae-in government' or 'responsibility of the previous administration' in just about one and a half years after President Yoon took office. [1]
All-out strikes:
Whenever negative issues arose—ranging from skyrocketing real estate prices, the phase-out of nuclear power policy, increasing national debt, the 2023 Jamboree failure, controversies over diplomatic tours, to the paralysis of public safety and computer networks—they directly pointed to "entrenchment by the previous administration" or "the previous government's reckless management and accumulated insolvency" through official briefings and comments from the ruling party (People Power Party).

Mobilization of audits and investigations:
Through the Board of Audit and Inspection and the prosecution, they extensively dug into allegations of statistical manipulation by the previous government and the West Sea civil servant shooting incident, continuing a constant institutional offensive for years that went beyond mere political rhetoric. [1,2,3]


2. Lee Jae-myung Government's 'Blame on Yoon Suk-yeol Government': Limited and conditional responsibility theory
On the other hand, the Lee Jae-myung government, which came to power through the June 2025 by-election/early presidential election, also criticized the shortcomings of the Yoon Suk-yeol era regarding issues such as the paralysis of the national computer network, rising real estate prices, and diplomatic/nuclear armament controversies, but the frequency of remarks and the number of reports are significantly lower compared to the Yoon Suk-yeol government's blaming of the previous administration.
Change in justification due to judicial punishment of the President:
The former president was removed from office after the Constitutional Court upheld the impeachment due to incidents such as the declaration of martial law. Since the previous administration had already collapsed due to constitutional errors and was undergoing judicial punishment (for crimes such as insurrection), there was little practical benefit for the Lee Jae-myung government to engage in political disputes by going out of its way to blame 'the previous government' for policy failures. They were merely subjects for 'liquidation,' so there was little need to use them as an excuse to cover up the current administration's incompetence.

Difference in media framing:
When livelihood instability occurred, such as rising apartment prices in the early days of the administration, many conservative and mainstream media outlets actively raised the frame of 'insufficient measures by the Lee Jae-myung government,' unlike during the Yoon Suk-yeol administration. In the process of the government and the ruling party refuting this, it only reached the level of explaining that "instability in the real estate market is due to excessive deregulation accumulated during the Yoon Suk-yeol government."

Comments 0

No comments yet
0