I believe the President is in a position where they should not be debating. Roh Moo-hyun and Lee Jae-myung are mistaken...

They say Kim Il-sung of North Korea was like that, right? Saying that no one could ever win against Kim Il-sung in a debate......
What is the conclusion of a debate?
Is it "you are right and I am wrong"
Or is it "having the opportunity to fully listen to your opinion"??
The President is not in a position to do those things. Such debates or discourses should be
handled by specialists in those fields who derive a certain level of conclusion,
report it to the President, and then the President discusses it with advisors to make decisions and push forward. But instead,
they try to confront commentators using the same verbal skills they used as a lawyer.
That doesn't lead to a conclusion; it just shows that they are good at arguing.
Even during the Roh Moo-hyun era, he frequently engaged in arguments with others, but as a result,
instead of properly reflecting others' opinions and changing direction, it only led to
focusing on how to package his own opinions well to advertise and inform the public. I have come to
accept that this is simply the inherent structure of the position.
To engage in true debate, one must admit their own ignorance and act as a chairperson,
encouraging others to debate and providing a platform to listen to various opinions.
Their very way of thinking is flawed from the start. "I'm also quite good at wordplay, so I want to go head-to-head with them"
Because they have such ridiculous thoughts, communication fails and subordinates don't want to stay by their side. Tsk tsk tsk tsk tsk.